> It really doesn't > goes on to describe significant cognitive load You know, it’s fine as well, when there’s a point to it. In this case we have a fairly we

> It really doesn't > goes on to describe significant cognitive load You know, it’s fine as well, when there’s a point to it. In this case we have a fairly well written article giving some interesting context around cargo cults, but certainly nothing that contradicts the central idea around the metaphor, and no injured parties AFAICT. So that’s a no.