5 ms·
Here is an alternate possibility 1. They introduced a checkbox for "users to confirm that they are not affiliated with WP Engine" 2. A court ordered Automatti
by harikb 2y ago
Here is an alternate possibility
1. They introduced a checkbox for "users to confirm that they are not affiliated with WP Engine"
2. A court ordered Automattic to reverse course
3. Developer thought it was easy to quickly just change the text rather than make code changes.
Let us not say people are crazy when there are alternate narratives
- lupire 2y agoThat's likely to corrupt the database backend, which now appears to store old "non WP Engine" affirmations in the same location as new "pineapple pizza" affirmations. How will they be able to distinguish?
- LocalPCGuy 2y agoYou're assuming they actually care to distinguish. But real answer, barring a brief period where some users may get a cached version, they can likely just use the date of change to determine before and after if necessary.
- nathansherburn 2y agoI don't think the purpose of the checkbox was to collect useful data but an any case storing it as a date would probably solve the issue.
- lolinder 2y agoNo, the server-visible name has changed.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- whimsicalism 2y agonot only would i say this is a possible explanation, i would say it is the obvious explanation - and pretty ridiculous to accuse someone of having a mental breakdown based on this
- hn_throwaway_99 2y agoLol, this is like every bad stereotype about the general quality of WordPress websites: "Getting rid of a checkbox is too technically complicated, so let's just change the text instead to something completely nonsensical." I actually find your explanation even less believable than this being a symptom of a crazy person (which I don't necessarily believe it is either).
- hluska 2y ago3. Developer thought it was easy to quickly just change the text rather than make code changes. To some nonsense about pineapple on pizza? Are there any adults left?
- GCUMstlyHarmls 2y agoMaybe the engineer was debating a LLM on the merits of pineapple on pizza and didn't clear the context history before requesting a code change.
- MarkSweep 2y agoNo reasonable developer, given the requirement “remove this checkbox as required by a court order”, would respond by changing it to “I love pineapple on pizza”. There are so many other things that could be possibly done instead: just remove it, hide it with CSS, change it to a “<input type=hidden />”, or change the text to “please check the box” if it was really so hard to remove. I can’t imagine any lone developer or product manager being so petty that they would risk their job to spite a court order. The checkbox is only there because someone higher up wants it to be there.
- applesnacker 2y agoYou can easily verify this wasn't the case by checking archive.is and seeing that the checkbox was removed for a day before the new one was added or checking stories and comments on what happened or looking at the commit history since the repository is open source. If there were no facts in evidence, it your alternate possibility would still not be plausible since there's no reason the person wouldn't hide the checkbox if they didn't want to delete it but there's also no reason not to just delete it since removing it from the client is as much of a code change as changing the text.
- bruceallmighty 2y agoThe WPEngine checkbox was removed late in the week, and replaced with the pineapple question after the weekend. Developers on WordPress.org have stated that the value was not stored, and still is not stored. Matt also said he didn't care if you checked it or not. WordPress isn't as legacy as those platforms for whom "too hard to change the functionality, just change the text" is common.