9 ms·
I think hearing the facts from a governor who's responsible for the fires isn't the brightest idea. A better source would have been third parties or even some o
by behnamoh 2y ago
I think hearing the facts from a governor who's responsible for the fires isn't the brightest idea. A better source would have been third parties or even some opposition party that scrutinized what Gavin has done in this state.
- iscrewyou 2y agoThis isn’t a debate floor. People’s lives are being are affected by the minute. A governor is stating what’s going on. And the opposition is spreading lies.
- behnamoh 2y agousername checks out... Seriously tho, "A governor is stating what’s going on." is not the same as him telling facts.
- rybosworld 2y ago> from a governor who's responsible for the fires It's wild how much credit and blame we assign to government officials. For instance: Many Americans essentially believe that the president has a lever in their office to adjust the price of gas up and down
- wurzelgogerer 2y agoI don't quite follow you here unfortunately. How exactly is the governor responsible for the fires?
- trillic 2y agoI feel similar levels of cognitive dissonance when a Floridian governor claims he cannot simply stop a hurricane. What the hell do we even have politicians for if they can’t change the weather!? Have we considered the use of nuclear weapons on the fire? Dear leader trump had a great idea on dat last time there was danger cuming for Florida.
- lern_too_spel 2y agoIt's possible to have a useful debate about whether California's fire preparedness and response is what it should be. That's not what's happening here. What's happening here is some tweet from an account with 25.4 million followers says California has cut specific budgets, but the actual budgets say otherwise. Some tweet from an account with 4.7 million followers says 60 Oregonian fire trucks are held up in Sacramento for emissions testing, but they were already in Los Angeles and never went through emissions testing.