3 ms·

Climate has always been changing. Even before humans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles still

Climate has always been changing. Even before humans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles still holds, and explains quite a bit, though recent research added a few more factors, none of them human related. There's no conspiracy, you just seem to believe more to the "TV approved" science.

baggachipz 2y ago
You're alleging that there's "TV approved science", in which you're absolutely declaring a conspiracy that the "TV people" are colluding to distort the "facts". I'd ask you to explain this[1], but you're arguing in bad faith to conform to your world view. [1] https://assets.science.nasa.gov/dynamicimage/assets/science/esd/climate/internal_resources/2679/co2-graph-072623.jpg https://assets.science.nasa.gov/dynamicimage/assets/science/... Again, if you're unwilling to accept the findings of the organization responsible for a great many of society's technical advancements, then you're merely trolling.
AtlasBarfed 2y ago
[flagged]
- polotics 2y ago
  Please AtlasBarfed with such a leet pseudo don't let yourself get trolled down into this kind of statement!
Toutouxc 2y ago
Which bit exactly do Milankovitch cycles explain? Isn't the current orbital configuration such that the earth should be slowly cooling? Do you have any sources for what you're saying?
roelschroeven 2y ago
Do you have any idea how fast current global warming is compared to historical changes? Go to https://xkcd.com/1732/ https://xkcd.com/1732/ and scroll all the way down. That should give some perspective on that. Do you have any idea how much more devastating current global warming is in our civilization of 8 billion people, all interconnected socioeconomically? Or are you trying to say that global warming isn't human related? In that case, are you (a) willfully ignorant or (b) arguing in bad faith?
- baggachipz 2y ago
  It should also be noted that that comic was published 8 years ago. We're now at +1.5c, which means we're actually doing worse than his "current path" line from back then.

baggachipz 2y ago

You're alleging that there's "TV approved science", in which you're absolutely declaring a conspiracy that the "TV people" are colluding to distort the "facts". I'd ask you to explain this[1], but you're arguing in bad faith to conform to your world view. [1] https://assets.science.nasa.gov/dynamicimage/assets/science/esd/climate/internal_resources/2679/co2-graph-072623.jpg https://assets.science.nasa.gov/dynamicimage/assets/science/... Again, if you're unwilling to accept the findings of the organization responsible for a great many of society's technical advancements, then you're merely trolling.

AtlasBarfed 2y ago

[flagged]

polotics 2y ago
Please AtlasBarfed with such a leet pseudo don't let yourself get trolled down into this kind of statement!

Toutouxc 2y ago

Which bit exactly do Milankovitch cycles explain? Isn't the current orbital configuration such that the earth should be slowly cooling? Do you have any sources for what you're saying?

roelschroeven 2y ago

Do you have any idea how fast current global warming is compared to historical changes? Go to https://xkcd.com/1732/ https://xkcd.com/1732/ and scroll all the way down. That should give some perspective on that. Do you have any idea how much more devastating current global warming is in our civilization of 8 billion people, all interconnected socioeconomically? Or are you trying to say that global warming isn't human related? In that case, are you (a) willfully ignorant or (b) arguing in bad faith?

baggachipz 2y ago
It should also be noted that that comic was published 8 years ago. We're now at +1.5c, which means we're actually doing worse than his "current path" line from back then.