2 ms·
it is predictable because they are hired and promoted because of their sexual identity and gender (which has no connection to job duties), not merit. The momen
by slt2021 2y ago
it is predictable because they are hired and promoted because of their sexual identity and gender (which has no connection to job duties), not merit.
The moment you start hiring based on identity, instead of merit is when things will go south
- lupusreal 2y agoExactly. If the special non-merit criteria were instead "likes trains" or "has a monobrow" it would have the same effect. Not because those traits are negatively correlated with being good at the job, but simply because those traits are unaligned with the job, so statistically its unlikely for the best candidate to just coincidentally happen to also have those special traits.