The article uses “Internal Quality” which has a specific definition for them. And their definition of agility is not derived from the manifesto or Agile. Indee

The article uses “Internal Quality” which has a specific definition for them. And their definition of agility is not derived from the manifesto or Agile. Indeed, they list Quality immediately followed by customer happiness (“loveability”) which is aligned with XP, the practice supported in the article. The agile manifesto isn’t the only way to deliver good results in software.