Sure, but the intended point of the article is the attitude, not the mere historical information. It's even in it's title. So, it makes sense that the thing th

Sure, but the intended point of the article is the attitude, not the mere historical information. It's even in it's title. So, it makes sense that the thing the author prioritizes and focuses on will be criticized. Would many be criticizing a historical article on the origins of the term, or the plights of the people it covers?