3 ms·
Interesting, but not surprising, that Agility only made place 5, way behind Quality. It will soon be a quarter of a century since the Agile Manifesto has been p
by weinzierl 2y ago
Interesting, but not surprising, that Agility only made place 5, way behind Quality. It will soon be a quarter of a century since the Agile Manifesto has been published. It would be sad if we hadn't progressed since then.
- heeton 2y agoThe article uses “Internal Quality” which has a specific definition for them. And their definition of agility is not derived from the manifesto or Agile. Indeed, they list Quality immediately followed by customer happiness (“loveability”) which is aligned with XP, the practice supported in the article. The agile manifesto isn’t the only way to deliver good results in software.
- sisve 2y agoI did not understand it as an ordered list? Just a set of 6 items. Did i miss anything? What makes you conclude that this is a priortized list? Profitability is number 6. Who cares about internal quality if you are not making money in the long run
- agos 2y agoif you'll allow some negativity, I wouldn't expect a talk at a "Scrum Gathering" to care much about the Agile Manifesto