tt feels llke this is just making a bunch of excuses for why fires are such a problem. The real question should be, is it impossible to have 100% safe controlle

tt feels llke this is just making a bunch of excuses for why fires are such a problem. The real question should be, is it impossible to have 100% safe controlled fires, or is it too costly? Can they not do smaller fires over weeks to make sure it doesn't get out of control? Can they not have a contingency plan in case one gets out of control? I'm sure there are decades of discussion on this and I don't have all the information, but the results speak for themselves. For more than a decade we haven't been able to prevent catastrophic fires (not sure about before). Judging from the other problems plaguing CA for decades, it would seem there are other factors that have more to do with leadership. But what do I really know, maybe CA is a unique geography with unique history that all collide and create an extremely hard to manage state.