4 ms·
I've always wanted to switch to qubes, but it just feels so constraining. It's safer to never leave the house, but I don't want to live in a self imposed prison
by tasn 2y ago
I've always wanted to switch to qubes, but it just feels so constraining. It's safer to never leave the house, but I don't want to live in a self imposed prison. On the other hand, the isolation provided by containers and flatpak is more accessible, but with a much larger attack vector.
Maybe we need immutable OS + an audit layer on anything that could allow exploits to persist (bashrc and the likes).
- flubbergusto 2y ago[dead]
- irundebian 2y agoAfter Qubes OS I ended up using Fedora with Wayland, Flatpaks and running applications as different users but this introduced other problems. The security profiles of many "flatpacked" applications are quite permissive (see https://flatkill.org/ https://flatkill.org/) so that they could be circumvented. Besides that I'm experience some convenience issues when accessing files on my drive. It's especially annoying when using "flatpacked" office such as onlyoffice.
- bobertlo 2y agoI just really appreciate separating things like access credentials from things like web browsers without running multiple accounts. I do all my most and least secure activities on Qubes and use other computers for a lot of the other stuff in between.