3 ms·
Respectfully, the issue here was not that intelligence agencies were saying "we have no eveidence of this". first few sentences of the article shows the reali
by zonkerdonker 2y ago
Respectfully, the issue here was not that intelligence agencies were saying "we have no eveidence of this".
first few sentences of the article shows the reality, these agencies were vehemently stating that it was not possible that the Havana Syndrome was caused by bad foreign actors, full stop.
- EA-3167 2y agoAre people really surprised that an intelligence agency's first duty isn't to the truth or accurately informing the public? ed: sp
- econ 2y agoThose might be agents too. The narrative might have started with electric fields from the grid stressing people if not causing cancer. Then moved to radio, wifi, the so called biological radio frequency spectrum. Etc It was always an engineered argument between one camp advocating absurdly human fragility vs the other camp pretending we are indestructible supper beings and no form of radiation could harm us - ever! It sets up the perfect climate to prevent a honest objective scientific discussion.