3 ms·
Isn’t disabling employee comments about working conditions (including at least one mention of a union) in violation of labor laws? I wonder if JPMC thinks they
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
Isn’t disabling employee comments about working conditions (including at least one mention of a union) in violation of labor laws? I wonder if JPMC thinks they can get away with it because the new administration will not pursue a labor complaint against them.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Isn’t disabling employee comments about working conditions (including at least one mention of a union) in violation of labor laws? Genuine question: is it? (“Shut[ting] down comments on an internal webpage” versus deleting specific comments.)
- lesuorac 2y agoSeems like it to me. It's akin to having a no t-shirt policy and not enforcing it until somebody wears a union shirt.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoI think the practical answer is the interpretation of the law is up to each admin’s NLRB. I do recall cases under the Biden administration where similar employee communications were protected.
- toomuchtodo 2y agohttps://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-accused-restricting-workers-slack-social-media-use-by-us-labor-board-2024-10-11/ https://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-accused-restricting...
- SR2Z 2y agoEven under the old admin, this is not the kind of thing that's easy to punish a company for without an aggrieved union to press the case.