> I doubt that "land use" is a big issue in one of the least densely populated countries on earth. All evidence to the contrary, apparently. One report I foun

> I doubt that "land use" is a big issue in one of the least densely populated countries on earth. All evidence to the contrary, apparently. One report I found cited "50 km" as sufficient separation. Applying this as a radius you get 7854 square kilometers of land. > Using the existing infrastructure probably makes it slightly cheaper though. "it", here, could mean either the "green energy" operation or the observatory site.