4 ms·
To prove "liberal justices are leaders in corruption?" Uhhh no. Not only should GP provide evidence that liberal justices are routinely receiving bribes, but t
by llamaimperative 2y ago
To prove "liberal justices are leaders in corruption?" Uhhh no.
Not only should GP provide evidence that liberal justices are routinely receiving bribes, but that, as "leaders", they are dwarf the ones Clarence Thomas took and didn't report.