4 ms·
Also not physicist, but they always felt like smudge factors. Put in this stuff we don't know what it is and only interacts in certain ways to right places and
by Ekaros 2y ago
Also not physicist, but they always felt like smudge factors. Put in this stuff we don't know what it is and only interacts in certain ways to right places and finally math works out. Well it is obvious that they can work if you can mostly freely tune parameters until they do. But then you need two different things...
Somewhat reminds me of aether...
- exmadscientist 2y agoFormer physicist here! I used to work on this stuff. I don't think anyone has ever been a "true believer" in dark matter or dark energy. There was a pattern in late-19th- through late-20th-century physics wherein someone noticed something weird, said "hey, if X were true, it'd be kind of weird, but it would explain it all", then people went out and looked for evidence of X. In many, many cases, people did indeed find X, some closely related X', or at least got strong evidence in favor of something else Y, which might have disproved X but at least settled the matter. This has not happened with dark matter or dark energy. The questions still remain open, with no good evidence for any explanations. So... what I'm saying is, don't think less of people for trying to explain things, just because they tried and it didn't work out yet. You're seeing the scientific method play out right now: there is a whole lot of wrong. There was a lot of wrong in the old days, too, but we weren't around to see it; only the successes got passed down.