4 ms·
There's more evidence for this Black Hole theory than there is for the Big Bang, but not it's not like there's any laboratory experiment that can be done afaik.
by quantadev 2y ago
There's more evidence for this Black Hole theory than there is for the Big Bang, but not it's not like there's any laboratory experiment that can be done afaik. It's all about measuring things in astronomy. Big Bang theory at this point is hilariously wrong, and doesn't fit much evidence nowadays. Big Bang is disproven.
- thrance 2y agoOk, by that comment you told me everything I wanted to know: you're pulling this out of thin air. Please provide sources whenever you make insane claims like "Big Bang is disproven". Because it's not [1]. Also you told me there's "more evidence for this Black Hole theory than there is for the Big Bang", so please link to it, that I might examine it and maybe change my mind. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Observational_evidence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Observational_evide...
- quantadev 2y agoThe Big Bang is disproven because we see fully formed galaxies when we look out at the edge of the universe using James Webb Telescope. That's conclusive proof it's wrong.
- drdeca 2y ago“edge of the universe”? What?
- quantadev 2y agoIn the context of the Big Bang theory, the 'edge' is at the distance away from us at which seeing any light from that distance would have to mean that light started traveling "before" the big bang, which is considered impossible, due to constant speed of light and hubble expansion.