4 ms·
> But beyond that, you're sadly mistaken if you believe that humans actually maximize utility and follow any kind of logical equation in their lives. This obje
by critic 18y ago
> But beyond that, you're sadly mistaken if you believe that humans actually maximize utility and follow any kind of logical equation in their lives.
This objection is of the kind "you can't use scientific models to describe our world":
Planets are not points (don't use Newton's equations).
Temperature begins to exist only after you wait an infinite amount of time for the system to reach an equilibrium.
etc.
The maximization of utility may be an approximation, but it's definitely a more helpful mental model of human preferences than none at all, and claiming that somehow hating failures and loving success should translate into self-loathing because all humans are fallible.
Anyhow, I'm working on not arguing this year, so I'll leave you here. Sorry I started this branch of the discussion.
- ahoyhere 18y agoI'm guessing that you know exactly how full of crap you are and are just waiting to see how many people eat it up like a delicious ham sandwich. You know very well that by referring to actual studies of human nature I am not, in any way, implying or suggesting that "you can't use scientific models to describe our world." It's not funny, and it's not clever.