> it's a description of a suite of observed properties "Looks like matter" is not a property, this interpretation already presupposes a theory that excludes ma

> it's a description of a suite of observed properties "Looks like matter" is not a property, this interpretation already presupposes a theory that excludes many others that are heretofore still plausible. Physicists tend to ignore those other options, I believe, because of a combination of natural human linguistic biases and the desire for certainty in explanatory models that drives many of us into studying physics. Some get too confident too early and start making dogma their entire academic personality.