PDF: https://ia902305.us.archive.org/34/items/gov.uscourts.cand.415175/gov.uscourts.cand.415175.373.0.pdf https://ia902305.us.archive.org/34/items/gov.uscourts.

PDF: https://ia902305.us.archive.org/34/items/gov.uscourts.cand.415175/gov.uscourts.cand.415175.373.0.pdf https://ia902305.us.archive.org/34/items/gov.uscourts.cand.4... Text: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67569326/373/kadrey-v-meta-platforms-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67569326/373/kadrey-v-m... "Meta's request is preposterous. With one possible exception, there is not a single thing in those briefs that should be sealed." "It is clear that Meta's sealing request is not designed to protect against the disclosure of sensitive business information that competitors could use to their advantage. Rather, it is designed to avoid negative publicity." "If Meta again submits an unreasonably broad sealing request, all materials will simply be unsealed." "One final comment. Between this sealing request and assertions in Meta's opposition brief such as "[t]hat document expressly discusses torrents and seeding", Opp. at 7, the Court is becoming concerned that Meta and its counsel are starting to travel down a familiar road. See In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, 655 F. Supp. 3d 899 (N.D. Cal. 2023)."