3 ms·
I asked Claude to go through all paper names and estimate how many have code vs how many are proofs: “Based on my analysis, I estimate: - ~35-40 papers (roughl
by sashank_1509 2y ago
I asked Claude to go through all paper names and estimate how many have code vs how many are proofs:
“Based on my analysis, I estimate:
- ~35-40 papers (roughly 35%) likely have significant accompanying code
- ~55-60 papers (roughly 65%) are primarily theoretical/mathematical proofs
“
I suspect even the remaining 35% doesn’t have much to do with programming languages, and I don’t think these stats change much for other conferences.
- JW_00000 2y ago> I don’t think these stats change much for other conferences. I'd severely doubt that: there is a large difference in focus on theory vs practice between conferences. POPL really is one of the more theoretical conferences. At a conference like ECOOP, you're unlikely to see many proofs (I'd guess at most 20% of papers, based on personal experience).
- sashank_1509 2y agoI did the same thing for ECOOP 2024: https://2024.ecoop.org/track/ecoop-2024-papers#program https://2024.ecoop.org/track/ecoop-2024-papers#program Claude estimates 10 papers related programming languages and its features and 27 related to theory, verification etc.