3 ms·
> As a person that would be considered dysgenic, yes, I think eugenics is bad, I guess you got me there. Implying that I support Eugenics because I want to lis
by invalidname 2y ago
> As a person that would be considered dysgenic, yes, I think eugenics is bad, I guess you got me there.
Implying that I support Eugenics because I want to listen to people and not pre-judge them is pretty much the exact thing I'm complaining about.
- laidoffamazon 2y agoI brought up eugenics because I’ve seen this before and you stepped up to bravely defend it against accusations of wrongthink. I think you’re telling on yourself here.
- invalidname 2y agoWhen did I defend eugenics? What specifically did I say?
- laidoffamazon 2y ago[flagged]
- invalidname 2y agoYou said this: > If I were to guess, the types of conversations that happen in these places that aren't gutter racism (they're eating the dogs etc) are going to be eugenics-adjacent, "enlightened" scientific racism instead. At least, that's what I've noticed among rationalists online. I responded without talking about Eugenics at all... My problem was with this phrase of yours: > "If I were to guess, the types of conversations that happen in these places" That's a pretty problematic phrase. You're "guessing" what they're saying then judging them to be guilty based on your imagination. Notice you're blaming me for that in this thread even though my response didn't mention that in any way. You chose to interpret that as me supporting Eugenics. That's projection. That isn't me. That is a problematic way to look at life and at people in general.
- laidoffamazon 2y agoI want to listen in on your eugenics adjacent conversations now