3 ms·
In a snake pattern, the neighbouring pixels on the left and right are related, but the ones above and below have skipped a whole row. And yeah that’s true! you
by graypegg 2y ago
In a snake pattern, the neighbouring pixels on the left and right are related, but the ones above and below have skipped a whole row.
And yeah that’s true! you end up with squares with Hilbert curves. But those squares are all « related » data. Then those squares are related to the squares near it. Zoom out more and that grouping of squares is related to the neighbouring macro-squares etc etc.
Basically the square shape is a positive. Kind of like how charting the derivative lets you see how random/related information is, grouping into these squares gives you a visualization of pattern-ness, rather than any specific measurement.
- n2d4 2y ago> In a snake pattern, the neighbouring pixels on the left and right are related, but the ones above and below have skipped a whole row. But this is also true in Hilbert curves across the boundaries of the "squares" that I mentioned. The two center pixels in the top row are much more distant than any two pixels would be in a snake pattern.