2 ms·

I thought that too until you go down the rabbit hole and realize it's been this way since apparently the beginning. It's also interesting to note just how hard

I thought that too until you go down the rabbit hole and realize it's been this way since apparently the beginning. It's also interesting to note just how hard everyone was tearing the author apart in the comments only for it to basically become true a decade later. https://web.archive.org/web/20110117190122/http://wpblogger.com/matt-should-resign.php https://web.archive.org/web/20110117190122/http://wpblogger.... I guess money is just some force multiplier for negative aspects of someone's personality. Just never get to see it in the beginning.

ricardonunez 2y ago
That guy was right predicting conflicts. The comments on that post are something.
graemep 2y ago
I think the conflict of interest is obvious, but most people did not know about it. I think it is so glaring that I would have assumed it would not have been set up like this. > guess money is just some force multiplier for negative aspects of someone's personality. I think there is an element of seeing himself as the good guy and therefore entitled to things as a reward.
bugglebeetle 2y ago
“If you want to find out what a man is to the bottom, give him power. Any man can stand adversity — only a great man can stand prosperity.”
whycome 2y ago
That’s a brilliant snapshot. Thanks for sharing. It also really shows the value of things like archive.org — this context would otherwise be lost if a site disappears. It’s also inspiring to see how Ben handled most of the comments/criticism.
JBiserkov 2y ago
Thank you for the "direct link to the bottom of the rabbit hole". This article makes the point clearly and succinctly.
gizzlon 2y ago
And supposedly Matt tried to get him fired for this post! >TLDR. In May 2010 Ben Cook wrote a post titled Why Matt should resign. [..] The post, a well-balanced, well-argued, and respectful post, was not liked by Mr. Mullenweg, who reached out to Ben Cook’s employer, Network Solutions, and tried to get Ben Cook fired. Network Solutions did not fire Ben Cook. Why? Because THAT POST "borders on hate speech" https://kindness.is/examples/2010/mullenweg-the-coward/ https://kindness.is/examples/2010/mullenweg-the-coward/

ricardonunez 2y ago

That guy was right predicting conflicts. The comments on that post are something.

graemep 2y ago

I think the conflict of interest is obvious, but most people did not know about it. I think it is so glaring that I would have assumed it would not have been set up like this. > guess money is just some force multiplier for negative aspects of someone's personality. I think there is an element of seeing himself as the good guy and therefore entitled to things as a reward.

bugglebeetle 2y ago

“If you want to find out what a man is to the bottom, give him power. Any man can stand adversity — only a great man can stand prosperity.”

whycome 2y ago

That’s a brilliant snapshot. Thanks for sharing. It also really shows the value of things like archive.org — this context would otherwise be lost if a site disappears. It’s also inspiring to see how Ben handled most of the comments/criticism.

JBiserkov 2y ago

Thank you for the "direct link to the bottom of the rabbit hole". This article makes the point clearly and succinctly.

gizzlon 2y ago

And supposedly Matt tried to get him fired for this post! >TLDR. In May 2010 Ben Cook wrote a post titled Why Matt should resign. [..] The post, a well-balanced, well-argued, and respectful post, was not liked by Mr. Mullenweg, who reached out to Ben Cook’s employer, Network Solutions, and tried to get Ben Cook fired. Network Solutions did not fire Ben Cook. Why? Because THAT POST "borders on hate speech" https://kindness.is/examples/2010/mullenweg-the-coward/ https://kindness.is/examples/2010/mullenweg-the-coward/