3 ms·
> If they're having a conversation in their house about your relationship It is not private though, we are not talking about diplomats doing it in confidential
by manquer 2y ago
> If they're having a conversation in their house about your relationship
It is not private though, we are not talking about diplomats doing it in confidential communications, nobody is objecting to that .
What we are describing is equivalent to having a public conversation in the street in front of your home where you can see them having it
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> What we are describing is equivalent to having a public conversation in the street in front of your home where you can see them having it Still rude, but nothing more.
- manquer 2y ago> Rude, inappropriate, presumptuous, offensive . All degrees of the same thing ? And the degree in the eyes of the subject
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoYour argument circles back to why the Chatham House Rule is gaining popularity. It enforces the figurative walls of your neighbour's house. > degree in the eyes of the subject Yes. The people actually having the conversation.
- manquer 2y agoSubject of the conversation not its participants. In a public conversation preferences of the subject i.e. who being talked about when discussing about them publicly matters more than the participants i.e who is doing the talking Period , done . if you disagree then you and I fundamentally different views on what is a civilized society and I hope my neighbors have my world view than yours.