3 ms·
lpwszThanks. In seriousness, no, that's not what I'm suggesting, and I find it an unusual thing to read from my comment. I'm saying a descriptive name for foo(
by asveikau 2y ago
lpwszThanks.
In seriousness, no, that's not what I'm suggesting, and I find it an unusual thing to read from my comment. I'm saying a descriptive name for foo() can give you a hint about what the type is, even if it doesn't literally and directly tell you what the type is.