10 ms·
>they complain about paying to be a platform exclusive. This smells wrong. There's absolutely no benefit for the developer to release an exclusive game on a p
by cube13 14y ago
>they complain about paying to be a platform exclusive.
This smells wrong. There's absolutely no benefit for the developer to release an exclusive game on a platform if the developer is paying the platform holder for the exclusive rights. The only way exclusivity benefits a developer is if the platform holder is paying them to stay exclusive.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- jblow 14y agoIt is not exactly that developers are "paying for exclusivity", it's that if they want to be on the platform, exclusivity is required, and fee payments are required. Basically, you have to pay to play. The reason a developer does it is because he hopes to sell enough copies on that platform to make up for the fees.
- cube13 14y agoIs exclusivity required only for independent developers, or does that also apply to non-MS published titles?
- jblow 14y agoIt is mainly an Xbox Live Arcade thing. They know they can apply exclusivity pressure to independent developers simply because enough of those developers will cave, since indies aren't generally willing to walk away from the deal.