4 ms·
> that if it saves 10 man-hours of work, copyright infringement is right. The posters to SO give copyright to the company as per the TOS. No copyright violatio
by Manuel_D 2y ago
> that if it saves 10 man-hours of work, copyright infringement is right.
The posters to SO give copyright to the company as per the TOS. No copyright violation is happening.
- kuschku 2y agoYou obviously haven't read the ToS. > You agree that any and all content, including without limitation any and all text, graphics, logos, tools, photographs, images, illustrations, software or source code, audio and video, animations, and product feedback (collectively, “Content”) that you provide to the public Network (collectively, “Subscriber Content”), is perpetually and irrevocably licensed to Stack Overflow on a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive basis pursuant to Creative Commons licensing terms (CC BY-SA 4.0) That requires named attribution, which SO violated, voiding the license.