> Aren't you promoting the same hearsay? I'm promoting the statistical observation that there is a 90%-95% chance that these types of stories are made up. My

> Aren't you promoting the same hearsay? I'm promoting the statistical observation that there is a 90%-95% chance that these types of stories are made up. My dataset is gathered over the last decade, from hundreds of stories, first published by the "victim", then detailed by the other party. > so it's buyer beware No. It's reader beware, if you want to take my comment into context. The fact is if there is no sensationalism, then there is no story. Hence we get mostly sensationalism when we get stories. And that's not hearsay.