3 ms·
The explained what they meant by that. Non-human seems like a poor term though, perhaps "non-photo" would be closer to what they mean?
by RobAtticus 14y ago
The explained what they meant by that. Non-human seems like a poor term though, perhaps "non-photo" would be closer to what they mean?
- einhverfr 14y agoI assumed they meant, like, bare-breasted elfs. And presumably you can have a photo of a stallion with certain parts visible but can't have a similar painting of a centaur.... Either way it becomes very difficult to draw lines.