> untyped references to strongly typed values I would call that weakly typed since there is no step before your code runs that validates (or even tries to vali

> untyped references to strongly typed values I would call that weakly typed since there is no step before your code runs that validates (or even tries to validate) that your program satisfies a "type system". But since the definition of "strong" and "weak" typing has always been vague, I will just say that it is stupidly typed[1], and that I am a pedantic nerd. 1. https://danieltuveson.github.io/programming/languages/stupid/satire/2024/12/10/stupidly-typed-languages.html https://danieltuveson.github.io/programming/languages/stupid...