5 ms·
I don't see any reason to be shocked about marcos statement about dropbox. Dropbox has the only advantage to be the first cloud-storage provider who get's the
by axx 14y ago
I don't see any reason to be shocked about marcos statement about dropbox.
Dropbox has the only advantage to be the first cloud-storage provider who get's the job done right. It's not Dropbox's security that made it so popular, it's just the way how simple it is to setup. Create an account, download the client, insert credentials and BAM you're ready to go.
There is also an alternative to Dropbox called "Sparkleshare" (http://sparkleshare.org/ http://sparkleshare.org/) it's nearly equal to dropbox's functionality (except the webinterface). The only reason why i'm not using it (yet) is the fact that they use there own IRC server to keep your data in sync (some kind of sync-messaging between your client machines).
So if you're having real security concerns, you can use sparkleshare and use your own IRC server (https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/wiki/Notification-service https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/wiki/Notification-serv...). Rent a small/slowish VPS with enough hdd space for your needs, run sparkleshare on it and you have your own dropbox. :)
- nroach 14y agoThat's fine if you're storing only small files, but sparkleshare is based on git and absolutely chokes on large files. So photos, home movies, and the like which live happily on Dropbox are a disaster on Sparkleshare. The main reason seems to be that it wants to buffer the entire file in RAM during the sync, which rapidly kills most consumer-grade machines.
- axx 14y agoOh, afaik, isn't Dropbox also based on Git? "home movies" - i see what you did there!