2 ms·
It's not really "of course", and I don't think we have such a theorem in general. But in this case, I believe the fact that it's not an integer follows from th
by less_less 2y ago
It's not really "of course", and I don't think we have such a theorem in general. But in this case, I believe the fact that it's not an integer follows from the same theorem that says it's very close to an integer. See eg https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4544/why-is-e-pi-sqrt163-almost-an-integer https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4544/why-is-e-pi-sq...
Basically e^(sqrt(163)*pi) is the leading term in a Laurent series for an integer, and the other (non-integer) terms are really small but not zero.