The judge's comment: "various interpretations of these disclosures render them ambiguous such that a reasonable user would expect the WAA and (s)WAA settings to

The judge's comment: "various interpretations of these disclosures render them ambiguous such that a reasonable user would expect the WAA and (s)WAA settings to control Google's collection of a user's web app and activity on products using Google's services." This is the current problem with the web business model and terms of services. Greedy (money gamified) execs hire deceiving lawyers to cover what they actually do with data about you as they monetize it. When you buy a product, it becomes clear over time whether it was worth it. When you get a service for free but you are the product, you never quite know what you paid and are actively misled about it. I've seen enough sausage made that I know this is, lets say, "not just a Google problem."