3 ms·
300mbps might be enough for 240p video, but that still sounds painfully slow.
by nubinetwork 2y ago
300mbps might be enough for 240p video, but that still sounds painfully slow.
- rolandog 2y agoOn the plus side, it might finally create an incentive for decluttering websites... given enough adoption.
- throawayonthe 2y ago[dead]
- Savageman 2y agoI have 400Mbps at home, I can play online games with 50ms ping and watch 1080p on YouTube, it's enough for most people.
- thomquaid 2y agoI have 10Mbps at home, 50ms pings, and 1080p streaming.
- crest 2y agoUse a lossy video codec if you need 300Mb/s for 240p streaming or just double check your math before making a fool of yourself with exaggerated claims.
- slau 2y agoYouTube supports 8K@60 at 300Mbps. I think most cat videos should stream without buffering.
- sevg 2y agoI can’t tell if this is a bad joke? 300Mbps supports a 4-person household all streaming 4k YouTube content simultaneously. Or two households streaming 4k Netflix content. A lot of people still have 50Mbps or less speeds on their fixed broadband line and they’re streaming content just fine!