This sentiment misses the point. It's not that Linux is not capable - it's plenty capable, and has been for decades now. It's that support for it is lacking. Th

This sentiment misses the point. It's not that Linux is not capable - it's plenty capable, and has been for decades now. It's that support for it is lacking. The lack of support makes Linux look bad, because, from the perspective of the end user, it doesn't matter who actually is responsible for the failure of something. If negative experience comes after installing X, then surely X is to blame, right? Wrong, as we both know, but this is the experience that needs to be managed, in order to make Linux successful. Entities who managed this experience made commercially successful Linuxes - Red Hat, Canonical, Google, and Steam as well.