2 ms·
The problem is not only about that author in 1998, it is two-pronged: - Despite numerous failures in the integrity of the peer review and editorial process (De
by JPLeRouzic 2y ago
The problem is not only about that author in 1998, it is two-pronged:
- Despite numerous failures in the integrity of the peer review and editorial process (Deer, 2020), the predicted high impact of this article influenced the Lancet decision to publish [0]
- There is no shortage of authors willing to publish weird stuff in scientific journals. Search for example articles about religious content in scientific papers such as these ones: [1-3]
[0] https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14058 https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14058
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38756930/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38756930/
[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38952642/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38952642/
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39152043/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39152043/