4 ms·
From your 4-year-old article: Shell had responded to the challenge that the accepted definition of the phrase "sustainable development" was "development which
by tdhs78 14y ago
From your 4-year-old article:
Shell had responded to the challenge that the accepted definition of the phrase "sustainable development" was "development which meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs".
Is that definition highly controversial now?
In any event, that certainly does not constitute a massive propaganda campaign against the public.
- analog 14y agoIn any event, that certainly does not constitute a massive propaganda campaign against the public. Well it depends how much they spent on it no? I'd guess that Shell spends vastly more on putting it's point of view across than Greenpeace is able to.