> Also note that the medical field selects hard for people who can memorize information, to the exclusion of people who can understand systems. This sounds lik

> Also note that the medical field selects hard for people who can memorize information, to the exclusion of people who can understand systems. This sounds like one of those complete bullshit memes that certain groups of people like to repeat. Very similar to tech people being "creatives" while other groups like sales are somehow not. Utter bullshit. > Compare to the invention of the perceptron, which took a joint effort between a polymathic neurophysiologist and a logician. While cross-field collaboration often yields the best insights, I hope you're not implying that computer scientists are somehow better at "understanding systems" compared to biologists. Not only are computer scientists hugely guilty of pretending that various neural networks are anything at all like the brain (they are not), its also the case that biological systems are fantastically more complicated than any computing system.