4 ms·
>> Speaking generally, for a CTO to personally ship more (non trivial code) code ... I think is such a double edged sword and even potentially dangerous. It is
by zerkten 2y ago
>> Speaking generally, for a CTO to personally ship more (non trivial code) code ... I think is such a double edged sword and even potentially dangerous.
It is dangerous and is likely to cause a range of problems. The challenge is stepping away from that part of the work. It would seem the best way to do this is to progressively give up this direct work and mentor your replacement(s) possibly reviewing changes before quitting entirely.
It seems to be a personality thing with some people being unable to take those steps before being forced by circumstances. I love leaders to have curiosity about details and want to create the environment for great technical work, but that is a very different type of work that doesn't drive the same rewards (or dopamine hits.)