3 ms·
We should also be asking if the benefits of a non-partitioned cache are truly there in the first place. I think the main claim is that if (for example) the same
by Retr0id 2y ago
We should also be asking if the benefits of a non-partitioned cache are truly there in the first place. I think the main claim is that if (for example) the same JS library is on a CDN and used across multiple sites, your browser only has to cache it once. But how often does this really happen in practice?
- sroussey 2y agoIn the days of jQuery… all the time. In the days of webpack, not so much.
- shanemhansen 2y agoWell I know it's not directly the answer to your question, but the article mentions that in practice a partitioned cache increases bandwidth by 4%. Which at the scale of billions of web browsers is actually pretty bad.