This article is in stark contrast to how the same issue was treated when it was about Kashmir. I guess the implicit idea is that if a foreign government does it

This article is in stark contrast to how the same issue was treated when it was about Kashmir. I guess the implicit idea is that if a foreign government does it to a population, it is bad, but if a native government does it, the same exact policy is good? While India’s sudden decision to revoke Kashmir’s autonomy has inflamed tensions with neighboring Pakistan, critics say the move could also drastically alter the demographic composition of the disputed territory itself — and some have warned it could come to resemble Israeli settlement in the West Bank. By stripping Kashmir of its special status, India’s government has done away with a law that allowed Kashmir to limit land ownership and permanent residency to natives of the country’s only Muslim majority state. Analysts say the change could bring about a profound transformation of Kashmir’s population that would exacerbate unrest there. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/08/08/kashmirs-new-status-could-bring-demographic-change-drawing-comparisons-west-bank/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/08/08/kashmirs-new...