> When an athlete does it directly and retains the money themselves, that's a disgrace. I'm not getting the feeling that the article is trying to say it's a di

> When an athlete does it directly and retains the money themselves, that's a disgrace. I'm not getting the feeling that the article is trying to say it's a disgrace, but it's aimed at that it's a disgrace that the executives are getting all the money while the athletes sees basically none of that. Reading around, it seems like the common opinion on it, but like everyone else, I too have somewhat of a bubble so might look different in other mainstream outlets I suppose.