4 ms·
Oh, that wasn't very clear from the article.
by bostonvaulter2 14y ago
Oh, that wasn't very clear from the article.
- jacobolus 14y ago"It also has tweeted repeatedly that the account is in fact a legitimate Shell account. But of course, it, too is a fake. Not that web users realise."
- pyre 14y agoIt's easy to overlook. The text of the tweet and the immediately following article text run together: http://imgur.com/OHq5z http://imgur.com/OHq5z
- corin_ 14y agoOne of the downsides of disabling javascript is that you may not see websites as they intend you to see them.
- pyre 14y agoI'm only using Ghostery, I wouldn't expect that to affect the main content of a site. Ghostery's blocked list: DoubleClick Facebook Connect Google +1 Google Adsense Google Analytics LinkedIn Widgets NetRatings SiteCensus ScoreCard Research Beacon Twitter Button Tynt Insight ... just disabled Ghostery, and one of those is affecting the article content.
- corin_ 14y agoMy guess is that Ghostery considers the javascript that is served by Twitter to be a tracking device (quite possibly correctly)... but I could be wrong.
- pyre 14y agoThe article did a horrible job of in-lining those tweets.