I would say the asinine comment was this one: > There's enough prior art to demolish this easily. It won't even remotely hold up under legal scrutiny if it's e

I would say the asinine comment was this one: > There's enough prior art to demolish this easily. It won't even remotely hold up under legal scrutiny if it's ever used by Apple in a lawsuit. I think this is a complete non-issue. It's just a summary dismissal, with no evidence whatsoever to back it up. My comment was tongue-in-cheek.