3 ms·
The point raised about removing the attributions of Luigi Mangione is valid and important. I don't sympathise much with the authors whining about being suspende
by Ma8ee 2y ago
The point raised about removing the attributions of Luigi Mangione is valid and important. I don't sympathise much with the authors whining about being suspended for upvoting Mangione's post, just because they were Mangione's.
- johnnyanmac 2y ago>I don't sympathise much with the authors whining about being suspended for upvoting Mangione's post, just because they were Mangione's. That's a bit hard to prove, no? How often does anyone look at the names of who posts what?
- Ma8ee 2y agoRead the post.
- johnnyanmac 2y ago>Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that". And you missed my main point. There will always be trolls. Now think about how many people just stumble on SO, find a good answer, and up vote it without realizing that person is a murderer. They may not even recall a name of whom they upvoted. Don't miss the forest of the trees if you don't wanna normalize social media taking action the law should (and is) doing.
- Ma8ee 2y agoThe post makes it clear that the author made the votes because of who wrote them. He did it intentionally and systematically. That was the reason to suspend the author. Reading before commenting saves everyone time, not only mine and yours, but everyone else’s that might stumble upon this thread.