7 ms·
《 And then, we will have less support engineers next year because we have an agentic layer. We will have more salespeople next year because we really need to ex
by nick__m 2y ago
《 And then, we will have less support engineers next year because we have an agentic layer. We will have more salespeople next year because we really need to explain to people exactly the value that we can achieve with AI. So, we will probably add another 1,000 to 2,000 salespeople in the short term.” 》
I guess they are building a saleforce at the expense of everything else !
- Finnucane 2y agoThat is that capitalist dream—all sales, no production expenses.
- jimbru 2y agoIdeally there would be no sales expenses either
- cruffle_duffle 2y agoWouldn’t my business AI agent automatically talk with the salesforce AI agent and buy it automatically? Why would you need buyers or even sellers? Why even have humans in the loop at all for any business process or transaction. My understanding from all the magazines at my dentist office is that AI will replace the whole thing. What’s even the point of humans? It’s just AI bots jerking each other off all the way down! …now my head hurts.
- ArtemZ 2y agoThere is no point in having humans, ideally we should end up with just Elon Musk and fully automated resource extraction and entertaining infrastructure to please him /s
- bayarearefugee 2y agoThey never seem to talk about what happens when the the dream is ubiquitously realized and nobody is left to buy whatever it they are selling because their production expenses fund someone else's sales. At least it will be interesting to see which pushes civilization off the cliff first, end-game capitalism ouroborosing itself or the direct impact of climate change (which is obviously also related in any case).
- gruez 2y ago>They never seem to talk about what happens when the the dream is ubiquitously realized and nobody is left to buy whatever it they are selling because their production expenses fund someone else's sales. "If we replace 95% percent of farmers with tractors, who's going to buy all the food that's being grown?"
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Terr_ 2y agoI'm guessing your intended subtext is something like: "eliminating jobs isn't bad or permanent since new kinds of jobs may be created elsewhere", but I don't think this satire/analogy works well. Historically speaking farmers didn't buy much food to start with, since they already had it or traded locally with their neighbors. It was everybody else (e.g. city artisans) who bought food, and they have kept buying it because all humans need to eat regardless of where--or whether--they are employed. Since bayarearefugee is talking about a scenario where the "dream is ubiquitously realized", that implies any new future job-categories are also eliminated. No jobs for repairing the foreman-bots that direct the repair-bots.
- ty6853 2y agoThere will always be jobs even if production increasing workers arent needed. If the capital owners can create massive wealth without labor they will always be willing to part with some of it to have concubines, personal chefs, chess trainers for their children, gladiators or whatever other nonsense gets their rocks off.
- bayarearefugee 2y agoNot really a clever observation on your part, this is the trite response everyone trots out but where it fails is in scope. We aren't talking about replacing 95% of a particular job (which has happened many times in the past over a long period of time), we are talking about replacing 95% of all people (in a relatively short period of time). And on top of that situation, we are also demanding unlimited growth. Good luck with that.
- rocqua 2y agoPut in AI to justify saving on support staff. Then hire more people to convince customers the AI is actually just as good as speaking to a real human... It feels like mixed messaging about whether AI is actually good.
- readyplayernull 2y agoThe classic tell, don't show.
- kibibu 2y agoIf they really wanted to back it, they'd use AI salespeople.
- frereubu 2y ago> we really need to explain to people exactly the value that we can achieve with AI This feels like one of those things where you're having to explain things so hard that it should give you a clue you're duping yourself. People don't get it? We just need more salespeople to explain it more. Gotta keep those KPIs up.
- griomnib 2y agoThe funny thing is you can’t hide how bad this shit is because at some point everybody who doesn’t have a personal assistant has to deal with customer support of some sort. And holy fucking shit has AI made every single interaction with a company ten times more painful and time consuming. It’s the worlds most boring video game where you had to trigger the right sequence of words with some dumb robot, only then to get placed into a queue of one of five remaining humans who themselves are just reading a script. The other day I had to beat the first barricade of AI chat to get in the human queue, and then it took them literally five hours to reply. I got a text at 1am. There is nobody who when connected to some AI agent thinks “great this will solve my problems quickly!” It’s just “wow they figured out a new way to screw us”.
- anal_reactor 2y ago90% of users have silly questions, which is why all customer support conversations start with "have you tried restarting your router" and "is electricity working in your area". AI chatbots are completely fine for those 90% users who have such simple requests, but they're indeed a nightmare for the 10% who can do basic troubleshooting steps on their own and need support with more advanced questions. Nobody cares though, because we're 10%
- DangitBobby 2y agoIs there any data to back this up?
- griomnib 2y ago
- Rebelgecko 2y agoAn LLM can't explain the value of Salesforce?
- griomnib 2y agoNot until it can take you out for steaks, booze, and strippers.
- majormajor 2y agoSomehow their "agent" AI can't do sales? Can't run email/call scripts? Can't track things in their own CRM? Huh. So they are telling customers that they'll make their work more AI driven while staffing up their own human sales?
- bee_rider 2y agoDo their customers value sales more than engineering? It seems like a self-consistent pitch if so.
- majormajor 2y agoLet's assume they do. They value sales, they believe Salesforce's pitch that the SF AI will reduce their sales cost. Yet Salesforce themselves is hiring more people vs simply dogfooding their own AI agents.
- mring33621 2y agoEngineers aren't hot chicks that show up with sandwiches.
- InkCanon 2y agoClassic solution in search of a problem thinking. "It's not that our solution isn't wanted, our customers just need to get it!"
- paxys 2y ago"Here's an AI Agentforce that can do all your sales for you!" "We have to hire thousands of salespeople to sell this AI agent" Something doesn't compute
- javierluraschi 2y agoThey are probably struggling to keep sales number up, they need more sales and cut costs. So makes sense to hire more sales people and freeze development… but that’s a sad story, let’s fix that sad story with AI: AI is so good that everything can be automated, except for sales which needs a personal touch. Wall Street happy, bonus for all execs, the end.
- thelittleone 2y agoSadly status quo of the vast majority of enterprise software companies, at least after growth starts to flatten out.