We linked to the same Catechism, just two different websites, good grief. Actually, the one you linked to, the IntraText version on the Vatican’s website, seem

We linked to the same Catechism, just two different websites, good grief. Actually, the one you linked to, the IntraText version on the Vatican’s website, seems to be the 1992 edition, which is out of date. The edition promulgated in 1997 is the definitive-official one, and that’s the edition that happens to be hosted by scborromeo, though the Vatican’s site might eventually get updated, after all it’s only been almost 30 years since the 1997 edition was published: http://scborromeo.org/ccc/aposletr.htm http://scborromeo.org/ccc/aposletr.htm The 1997 edition is also available here: https://usccb.cld.bz/Catechism-of-the-Catholic-Church https://usccb.cld.bz/Catechism-of-the-Catholic-Church > the Jesus chips are as magic in English as they are in latin. Characterizing the Eucharist as "Jesus chips" and "magic" is both offensive and sacrilegious, but hey, it's the Internet, so go figure. Finally, the teachings in JP2's 1997 Catechism and the Catechism of Trent regarding the Eucharist are harmonious, in no way in contradiction with one another. Anyone who wishes can read and compare for themselves: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038914233&view=2up&seq=276 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038914233&vi... Comparing the 1969+ liturgical reforms with the Tridentine Missal is another matter. This will be my last reply in this HN thread, there are more appropriate forums to discuss these matters.