3 ms·
If you’re under Rule 26 discovery or disclosure requirements, it absolutely might be my business whether emails in your client are valid, but I suppose you coul
by singleshot_ 2y ago
If you’re under Rule 26 discovery or disclosure requirements, it absolutely might be my business whether emails in your client are valid, but I suppose you could classify opposing counsel as an “attacker,” so you’re not wrong.
- tptacek 2y agoNote, just to rub this in: you don't even get the verification you're looking for, because DKIM verifies domains and not users.
- singleshot_ 2y agoI get the verification the email actually came from the domain (i.e., someone, who has the credentials of an insider) vs. an email that was totally spoofed, from the outside, without any creds of the purported sender org. (Right?) Hands on keyboard? You're right, absolutely not. But I can learn something useful via DKIM nevertheless.