> If that data is certified as end to end encrypted This needs better and more detailed clarification. I've reverse engineered a camera-equipped pet feeder, an

> If that data is certified as end to end encrypted This needs better and more detailed clarification. I've reverse engineered a camera-equipped pet feeder, and videos sent to a cloud (or my emulating server in my case) were partially encrypted - I-frames were, P-frames were NOT. Someone ticked a checkbox "videos are encrypted", and still left the thing glaring open. Then, of course, it's also a matter of ciphers and modes, authentication, key generation, transmission and storage, etc etc. Feels like encrypted storage and transmission features alone require a full whole label, like the FCC's broadband facts label, or FDA's nutritional facts label, which outlines what data exists in the system, where the data is stored, how it's encrypted, how it's authenticated, and so on. Which is probably not happening until cryptography 101 becomes a part of general school curriculum and layman people start to understand the basics. Without people asking real questions and refusing to purchase products from sloppy engineering companies (aka voting with their wallets*), companies will always wave it away with tried-and-proven "military-grade security" bullshit. ___ *) That is, if there's even a competition. When no one does things right (because consumers don't know and thus don't ask for it), there's nothing to pick from.