3 ms·
Well I think what was interpreted wrongly was that information could not propagate faster than light. The argument is that before time-space the Universe is a
by overu589 2y ago
Well I think what was interpreted wrongly was that information could not propagate faster than light.
The argument is that before time-space the Universe is a hyper dimensional. Vibration and periodicity giving way to the kind of probabilistic divergence described by D.D. In The Fabric of Reality. The entire universe might well spring from this vibrational axis giving rise to all. Space time would emerge from the entropic dilation.
If entanglement was the synchronization of vibrational coordinates, that “vector” could have one resolved state. I would not rule out instantaneous communication by that principle alone.
- krapp 2y agoEven with quantum entanglement, information cannot propagate faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This has already been experimentally verified, and the light-speed limit itself is one of the most thoroughly well proven concepts in physics. Here are two sources but you can find plenty of others [0,1]. [0]https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/entanglement https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-e... [1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-reasons-quantum-entanglement-doesnt-allow-faster-than-light-communication/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-r...
- PaulHoule 2y agoPersonally I think it's deeper than that. In God's geometry I think there is no way to say "faster than light". During the pandemic Steve Wolfram went off on a vainglorious scheme to unify physics (kinda doomed) but I appreciated his approach to "superspace" (the configurations of space/time that one might want to write a wavefunction over) in that causal networks must exist: e.g. two points have a spacelike relation or one is in the future of the other)